市场领导者的反击

评语 -Galaxy Z Fold7 的设计升级令人印象深刻Galaxy Z Fold7 消除了反对它的最大论点，现在它以纤薄的可折叠手机自居，能够提供高性能、良好的摄像头和不错的电池续航时间。此外，它还获得了 UWB 和 IP48 认证。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

虽然在基准测试中，SoC 的性能较低，这可能也与散热较弱有关，但这在日常操作中并不会造成太大影响。在我们的测试中，扬声器的表现也比 Fold6 差。这两个问题可能都是由于更轻薄的机身造成的。

Pros+ 超薄设计

+ 系统性能高

+ IP48 认证

+ 长期提供更新Cons- 摄像头的定位导致明显的晃动

- 不再支持手写笔

- 电池容量相对较小

- PWM

价格和供应情况Galaxy Z Fold7 的所有颜色和存储版本均可在三星网上商店购买，起价约为 2000 美元。目前亚马逊上的价格略高。

$1,819.99Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell Phone, 512GB AI Smartphone, Unlocked Android, AI Photo Edits, Large Screen, Long Battery Life, 2025, US 1 Yr Manufacturer Warranty, JetBlack

Table of Contents评语 -Galaxy Z Fold7 的设计升级令人印象深刻规格：三星Galaxy Z Fold7保护壳和设备 -Galaxy Fold7 配康宁大猩猩陶瓷玻璃 2软件与可持续发展 -Galaxy Z Fold7 七年来的更新相机 - S25 Ultra 的 200 万像素传感器显示屏 - 可折叠 8 英寸高亮度 OLED 显示屏Galaxy Z Flip7 的其他测量和基准测试笔记本检查总体评价可能的替代方案比较

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

三星公司倾听了用户对更轻薄的可折叠手机的需求，创造出了同类产品中最轻薄的一款。Galaxy Z Fold7 的主摄像头采用了新的传感器，但另一方面，它取消了对笔的支持。

该机的建议零售价约为 2000 美元（12/256 GB），中等型号（12/512 GB）约为 2120 美元，最贵版本（16/1024 GB）约为 2420 美元。

规格：三星Galaxy Z Fold7

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy 8 x 3.5 - 4.5 GHz, Oryon Gen 2Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 830Memory12 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay8.00 inch 1.11:1, 2184 x 1968 pixel 367 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2nd Screen: 6.5", 2520 x 1080, Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 223.5 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, UWBNetworking802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 4.2 x 158.4 x 143.2Battery4400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery charging cycles: 2000Chargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 16CameraPrimary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.7, 1/1.3", 24 mm, OIS) + 10 MP (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 1/3.94", 67 mm, OIS) + 12 MP (f/2.2, 1/2.55", 13 mm); Camera2 API Level: Level 3Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3.33", 17 mm); Cover camera: 10 MP (f/2.2, 23 mm)Additional featuresSpeakers: dual, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-C cable, SIM tool, One UI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | Dual-eSIM | IP48 | USB Copy Test: 375.35 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2)), Supported File Systems for external storages: NTFS (only reading), FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.242 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.418 W/kg | max. charging speed: 25 W (wired) / 15 W (wireless), fanless, waterproofWeight215 g

Price2099 EuroAmazon$1,819.99LinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

保护壳和设备 -Galaxy Fold7 配康宁大猩猩陶瓷玻璃 2三星Galaxy Z Fold7 的尺寸仅为 4.2 毫米（0.165 英寸）； 折叠6: 5.展开时为 6 毫米（0.22 英寸），折叠时为 8.9 毫米（0.35 英寸；Fold6：12.1 毫米（0.476 英寸）。虽然听起来差别不大，但在日常操作中却大有不同。Fold7 有四种不同的颜色版本，其中薄荷色在三星商店独家发售。做工令人信服，这款可折叠手机还符合 IP48 防水防尘标准。虽然从折叠状态打开显示屏相对困难，但这也意味着铰链可以在各种打开角度下将显示屏固定在选定的位置。令人讨厌的是，摄像头伸出得太远，导致智能手机平放在桌面上时晃动得厉害。

显示屏由大猩猩 Glas Ceramic 2 保护，背面则使用了大猩猩 Glas Victus 2。新设计的一个缺点是取消了对 S Pen 的支持。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈。可配置的电源按钮还配备了电容式指纹传感器，有时可能需要第二次尝试才能识别存储的指纹。此外，您还可以通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。通话时的语音质量非常好。

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

尺寸比较 - 展开

Oppo Find N5 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold DIN A6 ❌

尺寸比较 - 折叠式

Oppo Find N5 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold DIN A6 ❌

软件与可持续发展 -Galaxy Z Fold7 七年来的更新三星Galaxy Z Fold7 预装了谷歌Android 16 和 One UI 8.0，并将在七年内（至 2032 年 7 月 31 日）提供版本更新和安全补丁。Galaxy Galaxy S25 系列中的人工智能功能也可以在 Fold7 上找到。

在可持续发展方面，三星提供了一定的透明度，为其可折叠手机提供了一份报告，并提供了与可折叠手机的比较报告。可折叠手机的报告，以及有关使用可回收材料的比较详细的信息。用户还可以自己进行一些维修，三星会提供替换零件和说明。

相机 - S25 Ultra 的 200 万像素传感器与前代产品的一个明显区别是，Galaxy Z Fold7 没有继续在可折叠显示屏的屏幕下方使用摄像头。现在，两个前置摄像头在名义上是相同的，但盖板上的摄像头焦距为 23 毫米，而可折叠面板上的摄像头焦距为 17 毫米。质量还算不错，在光线充足的条件下也能拍出有吸引力的照片。

在背面的三摄像头系统中，三星将主传感器升级到了 200 万像素，据说使用了与 Galaxy S25 Ultra.其他摄像头与 折叠 6.总体而言，Fold7 的图像质量很有吸引力，并提供了多种选择，这也是因为它提供了额外的Expert RAW 相机应用程序。在光线条件良好的情况下，两个附加镜头也能提供良好的效果。当放大倍数超过 5 倍（115 毫米）时，图像质量会明显下降。

您可以使用两个前置摄像头以最高 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清视频。此外，主摄像头还支持 8k（30 FPS），包括 Log 格式和 UHD HDR。

三星Galaxy Z Fold7华为 Mate X6

3.5 ∆E5 ∆E1.4 ∆E4.5 ∆E3.8 ∆E6.2 ∆E3.7 ∆E5 ∆E4.1 ∆E2.5 ∆E4.1 ∆E1.9 ∆E5 ∆E4.3 ∆E4.6 ∆E1.2 ∆E2.9 ∆E8.6 ∆E3.9 ∆E4.7 ∆E5.7 ∆E3.1 ∆E1.3 ∆E4.2 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: 3.96 ∆E min: 1.15 - max: 8.58 ∆E

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

显示屏 - 可折叠 8 英寸高亮度 OLED 显示屏可折叠面板的子像素结构与前代产品相比，三星Galaxy Z Fold7 的可折叠主显示屏尺寸略有增加，现在的显示屏对角线为 8 英寸（20.32 厘米）。分辨率清晰，校准效果也不错。

尽管亮度与前代产品相近，但在我们的测试中却略显暗淡。但在日常操作中，你应该无法用肉眼察觉到差别。由于 APL 亮度较高，该显示屏也非常适合在户外使用--至少在亮度传感器控制亮度的情况下是这样。在没有亮度传感器的情况下，最高亮度可达 419 cd/m²。不过，如果激活附加亮度选项，最高亮度可达 703 cd/m²。

对显示屏闪烁敏感的用户在使用 Fold7 时可能会遇到问题，因为闪烁频率并不高，而且三星仍未提供任何高频 PWM 调光功能。

1333cd/m²1331cd/m²1328cd/m²1316cd/m²1311cd/m²1305cd/m²1300cd/m²1275cd/m²1265cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1333 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1307.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.09 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %Center on Battery: 1311 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}100% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.03CCT: 6413 K

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8"Oppo Find N5AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"Honor Magic V3OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldOLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"Screen4%12%20%Brightness middle (cd/m²)13111240 -5%1019 -22%1793 37%Brightness (cd/m²)13071179 -10%1032 -21%1599 22%Brightness Distribution (%)9591 -4%95 0%66 -31%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.41.36 43%1 58%0.9 62%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.43.06 10%2.2 35%3.1 9%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.22.4 -9%1.7 23%1.7 23%Gamma2.03 108%2.239 98%2.26 97%2.19 100%CCT6413 101%6353 102%6473 100%6714 97%* ... smaller is better

Display

HDR Peak BrightnessSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2708 cd/m² Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2687 cd/m² -1%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1712 cd/m² -37% APL18 Peak BrightnessGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2684 cd/m² +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2570 cd/m² Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1009 cd/m² -61%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzAmplitude: 13.73 %Secondary Frequency: 480 HzThe display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

色彩（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.724 ms rise↘ 0.679 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3685 ms rise↘ 0.3 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

户外活动视角稳定性封面显示Galaxy Z Flip 7 的封面显示屏尺寸增加到了 6.5 英寸，这主要是由于边框更加纤薄。在亮度方面，与前代产品相比也没有实质性的变化，前代产品的亮度已经可以达到很高。

在没有亮度传感器的情况下，我们看到的画面与可折叠显示屏类似，最大亮度分别达到 420 和 693 cd/m²。PWM 亮度控制也很相似。

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5"Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"Honor Magic V3OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"Oppo Find N52616x1140, 6.6"ScreenBrightness middle (cd/m²)1348209017431358Brightness (cd/m²)1346187617751328Brightness Distribution (%)94778896Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.21.50.91.14Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.93.52.12.21Greyscale dE 2000 *2.31.91.81.5Gamma2.04 108%2.25 98%2.25 98%2.213 99%CCT6461 101%6676 97%6353 102%6504 100%* ... smaller is better

Display

HDR Peak BrightnessHonor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4394 cd/m² +62%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2759 cd/m² +2%

2708 cd/m² Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2661 cd/m² -2% APL18 Peak BrightnessGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2784 cd/m² +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2600 cd/m² +1%

2570 cd/m² Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2440 cd/m² -5%

灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）色彩（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）户外活动视角稳定性Galaxy Z Flip7 的其他测量和基准测试

NetworkingSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1505 (min: 1432) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1494 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼81%

Oppo Find N5Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

682 (min: 502) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1562 (min: 1218) MBit/s ∼100%

Honor Magic V3Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

919 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼95%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

771 (min: 387) MBit/s ∼49%

Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

969 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

893 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼57%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1845 (min: 924) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1843 (min: 1524) MBit/s ∼100%

Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼97%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼78%

Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000

719 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

746 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼48%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼73%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1505 (1432-1642) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1493 (1302-1580) Honor Magic V3 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (808-971) Honor Magic V3 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø756 (387-800)

Geekbench 6.5 | 3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench AI | Jetstream 2 | CrossMark Geekbench 6.5

Single-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (2703 - 3200, n=5)

3046 Points +13%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

2888 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

2703 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

2170 Points -20%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1359 Points -50%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1982 Points -27%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=211, last 2 years)

1723 Points -36% Multi-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (9317 - 10029, n=5)

9817 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

9317 Points Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

8243 Points -12%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

6279 Points -33%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

4882 Points -48%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=211, last 2 years)

5030 Points -46%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

4536 Points -51%3DMark

Wild Life Unlimited ScoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (26398 - 27493, n=5)

26890 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

26398 Points Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

25231 Points -4%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

18997 Points -28%Average of class Smartphone (271 - 30553, n=194, last 2 years)

10953 Points -59%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

9302 Points -65% Wild Life ExtremeAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (6126 - 7029, n=5)

6722 Points +10%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

6126 Points Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

6089 Points -1%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

4626 Points -24%Average of class Smartphone (61 - 8140, n=196, last 2 years)

2897 Points -53%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

2584 Points -58% Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (5575 - 6955, n=5)

6651 Points +19%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

5955 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

5575 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

4341 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (62 - 8004, n=195, last 2 years)

2883 Points -48%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

2602 Points -53% Steel Nomad Light ScoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (2255 - 2698, n=4)

2550 Points +13%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

2255 Points Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

1987 Points -12%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1633 Points -28%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1549 Points -31%Average of class Smartphone (132 - 3064, n=128, last 2 years)

1365 Points -39%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1093 Points -52% Steel Nomad Light Unlimited ScoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (1959 - 2525, n=4)

2345 Points +20%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

2007 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1959 Points Average of class Smartphone (132 - 3017, n=127, last 2 years)

1321 Points -33%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1280 Points -35%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1043 Points -47%GFXBench

on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (112 - 120, n=5)

118.4 fps +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

112 fps Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

60 fps -46%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

60 fps -46%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

60 fps -46%Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=208, last 2 years)

59.4 fps -47%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (196 - 286, n=5)

255 fps +30%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

221 fps +13%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

196 fps Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

173 fps -12%Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 332, n=208, last 2 years)

114.8 fps -41%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

109 fps -44%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (67 - 120, n=5)

105.4 fps +57%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

67 fps Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

53 fps -21%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

51 fps -24%Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=209, last 2 years)

47 fps -30%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

38 fps -43%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (71 - 118, n=5)

102.6 fps +45%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

87 fps +23%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

71 fps Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

68 fps -4%Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=208, last 2 years)

44.6 fps -37%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

44 fps -38%3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (42 - 52, n=5)

49.6 fps +18%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

42 fps Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

38 fps -10%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

35 fps -17%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

31 fps -26%Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 53, n=209, last 2 years)

20.8 fps -50%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

20 fps -52%Geekbench AI

Single Precision NPU 1.5Average of class Smartphone (81 - 5210, n=45, last 2 years)

906 Points +88%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

482 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (n=1)

482 Points 0% Half Precision NPU 1.5Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=45, last 2 years)

4242 Points +816%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

463 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (n=1)

463 Points 0% Quantized NPU 1.5Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=45, last 2 years)

6051 Points +522%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

973 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (n=1)

973 Points 0%Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (223 - 334, n=5)

281 Points +26%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

222.934 Points Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years)

152.8 Points -31%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

147.767 Points -34%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

117.483 Points -47%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

87.027 Points -61%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

64.069 Points -71%CrossMark

OverallAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (1863 - 2354, n=4)

2206 Points +18%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1863 Points Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=132, last 2 years)

1122 Points -40%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1102 Points -41%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

983 Points -47%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

Points -100% ProductivitySamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1964 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (1930 - 1979, n=4)

1953 Points -1%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1163 Points -41%Average of class Smartphone (198 - 2084, n=132, last 2 years)

1068 Points -46%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

936 Points -52% CreativityAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (1787 - 1881, n=4)

1833 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1787 Points Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1063 Points -41%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1005 Points -44%Average of class Smartphone (163 - 1962, n=132, last 2 years)

993 Points -44% ResponsivenessAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (1802 - 7799, n=4)

6262 Points +248%Average of class Smartphone (239 - 13042, n=132, last 2 years)

2463 Points +37%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1802 Points Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384

1099 Points -39%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1064 Points -41%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Oppo Find N5Honor Magic V3Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5140%242%124%168%117% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)4080.353437.47 -16%3825.59 -6%1827.6 -55%3658 ?(1493 - 4384, n=49) -10%2206 ?(270 - 4370, n=193, last 2 years) -46% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)2239.553251.98 45%3393.12 52%1126.34 -50%2703 ?(555 - 3484, n=49) 21%1830 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=193, last 2 years) -18% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)403.69269.51 -33%365.48 -9%263.31 -35%379 ?(218 - 483, n=49) -6%293 ?(47.6 - 548, n=193, last 2 years) -27% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)51.23339.32 562%527.68 930%376.94 636%393 ?(50.7 - 730, n=49) 667%338 ?(9.4 - 964, n=193, last 2 years) 560%

Max. LoadIdle

42.1 °C41.5 °C36.9 °C 37.9 °C35.3 °C33.1 °C 29.4 °C29.4 °C29.9 °C

Maximum: 42.1 °CAverage: 35.1 °C

35.8 °C39.9 °C42.5 °C34.2 °C35.3 °C40.8 °C30 °C29.6 °C29.5 °C

Maximum: 42.5 °CAverage: 35.3 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

27.3 °C27.4 °C26.5 °C 27 °C27 °C26.4 °C 26.5 °C0.8 °C26.3 °C

Maximum: 27.4 °CAverage: 23.9 °C

26 °C26.3 °C26.3 °C26.2 °C26.2 °C26.3 °C25.7 °C26 °C25.7 °C

Maximum: 26.3 °CAverage: 26.1 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

78.7 % +53%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

59.2 % +15%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

56.1 % +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

51.5 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

82.5 % +43%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

71.7 % +24%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

58.3 % +1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

57.8 %

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø77.4 (66.8-129.7) Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø87.1 (72.8-129.9) Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø62.5 (50.9-85.9) Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.7 (43.1-54.8) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.5 (10.3-17.9) Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (9.05-15.5) Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.68 (8.38-11.7) Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.03 (6.39-7.74)

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 83% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Honor Magic V3 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 68% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 139)

14h 15min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold74400 mAh

14.3 h Oppo Find N55600 mAh

21.8 h Honor Magic V35150 mAh

13.8 h Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold4650 mAh

14.7 h

笔记本检查总体评价通过Galaxy Z Fold7，三星成功地打造了一款功能强大的新版可折叠智能手机，这尤其归功于其纤薄的机身。它最大的不足在于电池容量相对较小，尽管三星设法在一定程度上用非常好的效率弥补了这一不足。

Back to the verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

- 08/21/2025 v8

Daniel Schmidt

Chassis93%

Keyboard70 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device94%

Connectivity67 / 69 → 97%

Weight88%

Battery90%

Display91%

Games Performance37 / 55 → 67%

Application Performance85 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance30%

Temperature91%

Noise100%

Audio73 / 90 → 81%

Camera83%

Average80%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions90.5%Materials70%Packaging95%Power Use96.2%Repairability60%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 85.3%

可能的替代方案比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay

1.87.2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: $1,819.99List Price: 2099€215 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.00"2184x1968367 PPIDynamic AMOLED 2X

2.87%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $9.96Kepuch Screen Protector Comp...2. $6.07FZZSZS (3-Pack for Oppo Find...3. $7.27FZZSZS (4-Pack for Oppo Find...List Price: 1577€229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.12"2480x2248412 PPIAMOLED

3.86.3%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $11.993 Pack for Honor Magic V3 TP...2. $10.99Renwox 2pcs High Sensitive H...3. $7.99Anbzsign 2+2Pack for Honor M...List Price: 2000€226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"2344x2156402 PPIOLED

4.84.4%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $799.94Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...2. $1,442.99Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...3. $17.44Ferilinso 2 Pack Screen Prot...List Price: 1899€257 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.00"2152x2076374 PPIOLED LTPO

More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Galaxy Z Fold7 Series)News•三星Galaxy Z Fold7：更轻薄也意味着更多妥协 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold7：可修复性的实际状况如何？ |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold7：强大的设计升级 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold 7：根据 iFixit 拆解，可修复性非常差 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 在耐用性测试中被冻结、跌落和弯曲 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold7 预计可承受至少 50 万次折叠 |News•Galaxy 采用无折痕显示屏的 Z Fold8：三星似乎为 的 iPhone Fold 发布做好了充分准备Apple |News•售价高达 11,000 美元：三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 和 Flip 7 采用黄金和真陨石打造奢华版本 |News•三星发布Galaxy Z Fold7，配备更大的显示屏、新设计和增强型摄像头 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold 7：多张官方营销图片和规格表泄露，看不到 S Pen |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold 7、Flip 7 (FE)、Galaxy Watch 8 和 Watch Ultra (2025) 将晚于预期上市 |News•三星意外确认所有Galaxy Z Fold 7 和Galaxy Z Flip 7 (FE) 配置 |News•泄密者：三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 和 Flip 7 将比预期更薄 |News•泄密者：三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 和 S26 Ultra 终将采用 S-Pen 技术，并有额外优惠 |News•Ultra Unpacked：三星宣布举办Galaxy Z Fold7、Flip7、Flip7 FE 和Galaxy Watch 8 发布会 |News•三星Galaxy Z Flip 7 (FE)出现在据称是官方产品图片的所有颜色中 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold7 上手视频与Galaxy Z Fold6 和Galaxy S25 Ultra 的假人对比 |News•三星Galaxy Unpacked：Galaxy Z Fold7、Flip7、Flip7 FE 和 Watch 8 发布会最终日期和时间泄露 |News•Galaxy 未包装：三星或已透露 Z Fold7、Flip7 和 Watch 8 的发布日期和地点Galaxy ...

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 549 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 649191 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!